Maximum offer (70% rule)
The 70% Rule in House Flipping: How to Calculate Your Maximum Offer
The 70% rule: maximum allowable offer = ARV × 70% − repairs. Worked example, when 65% or 75% fits, what the MAO formula ignores, and a full maximum offer.
In this article
- What is the 70% rule in house flipping?
- How to calculate your maximum offer with the 70% rule
- When 65% or 75% fits better than 70%
- What the 70% rule leaves out
- The full maximum offer: every cost counted
- Rule of thumb vs full maximum offer on the same house
- How to use the maximum offer when you make an offer
The 70% rule says the most you should pay for a flip is 70% of the after-repair value minus the repair costs. The maximum allowable offer (MAO) formula is ARV × 0.70 − repairs. On a house worth $320,000 after a $48,000 rehab, that is $176,000. It is a rule of thumb: fast, useful as a filter, and silent about half of your real costs.
What is the 70% rule in house flipping?
ARV (after-repair value) is what the house should sell for once the work is done. The 70% rule takes that number, keeps 70% of it, and subtracts what the repairs will cost. The result is the highest price at which the rule says the deal still works.
Maximum allowable offer = ARV × 70% − Repair costs
The 30% you hold back is not profit. It is one bucket for everything the rule does not name: your closing costs when you buy, holding costs while you own the house, the cost of borrowed money, the commissions and closing costs when you sell, a contingency for surprises — and, after all of that, your profit.
That is why the rule works as a first filter and fails as a final answer. It is quick to apply at the curb or on a listing page. It cannot tell you what your margin actually is.
How to calculate your maximum offer with the 70% rule
Take the example house used across this site: 1,600 sq ft, 3 bed 2 bath, built in 1978. Comparable sales put the ARV at $320,000 and a zone-by-zone walk-through puts repairs at $48,000. (If you still need the first number, read how to calculate ARV from comps.)
| Step | Figure |
|---|---|
| ARV | $320,000 |
| × 70% | $224,000 |
| − Repair costs | − $48,000 |
| Maximum allowable offer (70% rule) | $176,000 |
| At 65% ($208,000 − $48,000) | $160,000 |
| At 75% ($240,000 − $48,000) | $192,000 |
The free Maximum offer calculator in Flip Investor OS does exactly this: ARV × the rule percentage − repairs − any other cost you want taken off the top (a wholesale fee, your closing costs), rounded down to the dollar, with the 65% and 75% figures shown next to it for reference.
Notice how much the percentage matters. Moving from 65% to 75% on this house is a $32,000 swing in the offer — on a profit that, as you will see below, is around $35,000. The percentage is not a detail.
When 65% or 75% fits better than 70%
The rule has no idea what your costs are. The percentage is where you tell it. A lower percentage holds back more money for costs and profit; a higher percentage assumes the costs are small.
Lean towards 65% when:
- You borrow hard money. Two points and 11% a year on a six-month loan is roughly 7.5% of the loan amount before you have fixed anything.
- The hold is long: a permit-heavy rehab, a slow market, a winter sale.
- You sell with full agent commissions (around 5–6% of ARV, plus seller closing costs).
- The price bracket is low. Fixed costs like title, inspections and utilities are the same on a $150,000 house as on a $400,000 one, so they eat a larger share of a cheap ARV.
- Prices in the area are flat or falling.
Lean towards 75% only when:
- You buy with cash and sell quickly.
- The house is in a higher price bracket, where the fixed costs are a small share of ARV.
- You know your selling costs are low (a flat-fee listing, a buyer already lined up).
- Your repair estimate is firm: a contractor's bid, not a guess.
If you are not sure which case you are in, the honest answer is that the rule cannot tell you. A full cost-by-cost maximum offer can.
What the 70% rule leaves out
Every cost below is real, and the rule treats all of them as "somewhere in the 30%". On the example house, with the defaults Flip Investor OS uses, they add up like this:
| Cost the rule never lists | On the example house |
|---|---|
| Purchase closing costs (2% of price) | $3,520 at the rule's $176,000 |
| Contingency (10% of repairs) | $4,800 |
| Holding costs ($1,500 a month × 6 months) | $9,000 |
| Selling costs (6% of ARV: commissions and seller closing) | $19,200 |
| Financing, if hard money (2 points + 11%/yr for 6 months) | $15,840 |
Costs vary by market, lender and season, so your own numbers will differ — but they will never be zero. Holding alone depends on taxes, insurance, utilities and the loan; see holding costs on a house flip for how to build that monthly figure.
Two more things the rule ignores:
- Contingency. A rehab estimate is a forecast. If you do not add a reserve, every surprise comes straight out of profit.
- Data quality. $48,000 from a walk-through with photos per zone is one thing; $48,000 from a guess on the driveway is another. The rule gives both the same offer.
The full maximum offer: every cost counted
A full maximum offer starts from ARV, subtracts every cost and the profit you want to keep, and what remains is the most you can pay. Because purchase closing costs are a share of the price, the last step divides by 1 + purchase costs % instead of subtracting them.
Maximum offer (cash) = (ARV − Selling costs − Holding costs − Rehab − Contingency − Target profit) ÷ (1 + Purchase costs %)
Flip Investor OS uses a target profit of 10% of ARV by default — $32,000 on this house. Here is the cash case:
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARV | $320,000 |
| − Selling costs (6% of ARV) | − $19,200 |
| − Holding costs (6 × $1,500) | − $9,000 |
| − Rehab + 10% contingency | − $52,800 |
| − Target profit (10% of ARV) | − $32,000 |
| = Room for price and purchase costs | $207,000 |
| ÷ 1.02 (2% purchase closing costs) | |
| Maximum offer, cash | $202,941 |
Check it: at $202,941 the purchase costs are $4,059; 202,941 + 52,800 + 4,059 + 9,000 + 19,200 = $288,000; 320,000 − 288,000 = $32,000 of profit. Every dollar is accounted for.
With hard money the same formula also subtracts the financing cost on the rehab part of the loan and divides by a bigger number, because every extra dollar of price is borrowed at 90% and costs points and interest. On the app's defaults (90% of price + 100% of the rehab budget borrowed, 11% a year, 2 points, 6 months) the financing cost per borrowed dollar is 0.02 + 0.11 × 6 ÷ 12 = 7.5%, and the maximum offer drops to $186,703. See how a hard money loan changes the numbers for the loan math line by line.
You can open the free calculator with your own ARV, repairs and assumptions; the same math runs in the deal analysis of every property you add.
Rule of thumb vs full maximum offer on the same house
| Method | Maximum offer | Profit if you pay exactly that, cash | Profit, hard money |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65% rule | $160,000 | $75,800 (23.7% of ARV) | $61,040 (19.1%) |
| 70% rule | $176,000 | $59,480 (18.6% of ARV) | $43,640 (13.6%) |
| 75% rule | $192,000 | $43,160 (13.5% of ARV) | $26,240 (8.2%) |
| Full offer, 10% target, cash | $202,941 | $32,000 (10.0% of ARV) | — |
| Full offer, 10% target, hard money | $186,703 | — | $32,000 (10.0% of ARV) |
The profit column is the full calculation at each price: ARV − price − rehab with contingency − 2% purchase costs − holding − selling − financing where there is a loan. Read the table two ways.
First, on this particular house the 70% rule is stricter than a 10%-of-ARV target: a cash buyer who insists on 70% would walk away from a deal that still leaves $32,000 at $202,941. A hard money buyer, though, is already down to 13.6% of ARV at the rule's price and to 8.2% at 75%. Same house, same rule — different margin, because the rule does not see the loan.
Second, the percentages are not interchangeable. 75% with hard money on this house leaves less than the app's default target. That is the whole argument for running the full offer before you sign anything: it shows the margin, and the stress tests in a flip profit calculation show how fast it disappears when the ARV comes in 5% lower or the rehab 20% higher.
How to use the maximum offer when you make an offer
The maximum offer is a ceiling, not an opening bid. Three habits keep it useful:
- Run the rule first, the full offer second. The rule tells you in a second whether a listing is worth an hour. The full offer, with your own holding, financing and selling numbers, tells you where to stop.
- Keep the rehab honest. The offer moves dollar for dollar with the repair estimate. An estimate where an unknown line is marked "Unpriced" instead of $0 — which is how Flip Investor OS handles it — keeps you from offering on a number that was never finished.
- Offer below the ceiling and negotiate towards it, never past it. If the asking price is far above your maximum, the house is not a flip at that price. It becomes one only if the price drops, the repairs shrink or the ARV is really higher — and the last two are the ones people fool themselves on.
No formula decides for you. What it does is show the margin of safety at a given price, so the decision is yours with the numbers in front of you, not after closing.
Frequently asked questions
What is the 70% rule in house flipping?
How do you calculate the maximum allowable offer (MAO)?
Is the 70% rule still accurate in 2026?
When should I use 65% or 75% instead of 70%?
Does the 70% rule include closing costs and holding costs?
How much should I offer on a flip if the seller is asking more than my maximum?
Try it with your numbers
This calculator is free in Flip Investor OS
A free account opens all eight calculators, no card needed. When a house is worth a walk-through, the same numbers carry into the estimate and the deal.